Everyday Words: Keep It Simple

Otherwise known as “ditch the jargon already.”

I studied writing at Carnegie Mellon University (well, I first studied it in high school and had a teacher who was practically the grand master of Strunk and White, but I’ll get to that later). At CMU, we were indoctrinated into the Erwin Steinberg methodology of Plain Language. Today, that may seem like a simple concept, but I assure you, it wasn’t always that way.

Dr. Steinberg was something of a visionary. There was a time when most, if not all, technical writing was to be drafted in passive voice. It should sound authoritative. Certain. Unfriendly. Passive was the way to go! Professional and technical writing was horrifyingly boring, and that is just the way everyone seemed to like it.

Except they didn’t like it.

Imagine having to read this all day:

“The program will be completed by users only after the messages are received. Emails that have been sent will not be opened upon receipt.”

Are you asleep? I know I am. It’s just awful. And that isn’t even an example full of jargon. Wait for this one:

“Users should redirect their interface from the AWS blockchain system and consider a CMS that works with the UI. It can be discussed in scrum whether the vector graphics will be wired in or whether that is a sandbox item.”

Yeesh. I’m not even sure that makes sense, because I just tossed in all of the jargon that popped into my head. But I assure you, I’ve heard plenty of conversations using that word-spaghetti.

Jargon causes a problem no matter what, because using it runs the risk that your reader won’t understand it. Even seasoned readers don’t know all of the potential terms.

So Erwin Steinberg’s philosophy, the one that he impressed upon the hundreds of students he taught, and the philosophy of legends at Carnegie Mellon was this: write it in plain language.

Presto!

Whether the text you are creating is something you understand quite well or it’s something you are translating for an SME (see what I did there?) – Subject Matter Expert, try to be sure that you simplify. This is not to say that every piece of writing needs to be watered-down. Of course not.

Consider the uses of jargon, and the need for explanation. Moreover, consider the origin. Journalist Allison Linn, writing for the Associated Press, discussed the emergence of the word “solution” in the tech industry. In common parlance, a solution is that which solves something. Easy enough, yes? But in technical jargon, a “solution” is merely a product. Tech companies release solutions.

Marketing took over and created jargon. Along came words like “enterprise,” “experience,” “agility,” “migration,” and a host of others. We now optimize things, we migrate data, and…gasp, we coined the portmanteau “blog” from Web and log, and you have this little project of mine right here.

The difficulty with jargon is that it is used by a subset of people, not the whole group of potential readers.

What Steinberg taught was that messaging, even technical documentation, needed to be accessible. Writers should identify their audiences and write to those. So of course, if the consumers of a given piece of documentation are solely, exclusively tech-familiar end users, and those users will understand the acronym SaaS, then by all means go ahead and toss it in. But by and large, if there is a snowball’s chance that any Tom, Dick, or Mary will get their eyes on the doc, then just write Software as a Service, and follow up with the acronym, willya?

There’s no need to dress up the text. And here’s where my high school English teacher comes in. He loved Strunk and White so much that his mantra was “Omit needless words.” That guy would legitimately write it on every piece of nonfiction prose any student submitted. He taught me the economy of words. He taught me a grave distaste for the word “nice,” demonstrating that it conveyed nothing of value.

Nothing, he said, was “nice.” It could be splendid, lovely, beautiful, tasty, delightful, mediocre, incredible, and a host of other words, but it could not be “nice.” I miss that guy.

The last word on this subject is: edit. Supposedly, (and I scoff at this, but I am pessimistic), Mozart wrote a symphony in a single draft. We are not Mozart. Cut the chaff. Weed out the unnecessary.

Especially if it is jargon.

And After a Hiatus…

I am really (truly) not a fan of those posts that apologize for when writers take a break from their blog and then assure readers that they will do better, be more faithful, write more – you know the drill.

And yet, here I am, apologizing for a lengthy absence. As if I have any readers left here.

The story goes that I moved from Pittsburgh (my bio still says I live there), and started a new job. That job was cool and it kept me busy, and I thought maybe I would just table the whole tech writing thing. I wasn’t really engaging in tech writing any more, so it made sense.

So, I left this little project alone.

Then, COVID-19 came along and I got laid off. Yeah, bummer, right? I focused more on my writing over at Medium (you can follow me there if you’d like, but it’s vastly different writing than it is here). I took some time to finish my as-yet-unpublished book. I’m still looking for an agent and publisher for that gem.

But after I got a new job, I was in proposal writing. Tech writing-adjacent. Sure, I edited and oversaw proposals in my tech life, but I started as a proposals manager for a small shop. Then I moved on to what I thought was a plum gig working for a friend at the company that brought me to Baltimore, then laid me off. Turns out that wasn’t the best gig, because they were undergoing lots of change.

And now, here I am, a proposal manager, but thanks to some strained workplace relationships, I am not really managing a lot of proposals, but I’m editing, moving things around, and digging in to some other work.

I’m hoping to leverage my smarts and talents to stay here and dig in to Confluence management and shoring up their much needed information architecture, but in the meantime, I will dust off my tech chops and head back to this comfy place.

All two or three readers, and anyone new who stumbles here will be treated to some new insights, a fresh look at how writing about technology dovetails with writing technical services proposals. I can’t give away any trade secrets, of course, or they wouldn’t be secrets. But all in all, I think I still have some good writing to share on this, my professional space instead of over at Medium, my personal platform.

So thanks for letting me take a break, and allowing me space to grow. Go grab a pint and let’s see what happens next.

Integration. It’s Where it’s At.

Photo Credit: Klim Musalimov

Integration.

Integrated. Technical. Communication.

More exciting than you think. Unless you are already a technical writer, and in that case you were already excited by the idea. Integrated Technical Writing is what folks who decided to call themselves “Content Strategists” have been yearning for all these years.

Yes, I’ve been known to lament that pretty much anyone can slap that label on and prance about calling themselves a content strategist, and it’s true. But if you can find a company whose position is fair and realistic, then integrating content and communication really is that strategy. And it’s fantastic.

I am with a company now, writing proposals for contracts with the government, local, state, and federal, and we GET IT. We totally get it.

I have embraced technical, marketing, and promotional collateral in such a way that I legitimately just put a woman in a sweet yoga pose on the front page of a proposal for the Department of Information Technology for the state where I work. Yes, indeedy. And the tag line is: “She’s flexible, but our standards aren’t.” It’s amazing. And we are going to win a $30 million contract as a result.

We are going to win it because our technical expertise is incredible, yes, but also because we wrote a top-notch proposal that sings marketing through and through.

Integrated Technical Communications has the key language built in:

It integrates the technical componentry with the Communication that needs to be done to sell. And selling is everything. If you cannot learn to operate the machine, the machine is useless.

The US Department of Labor Statistics will tell you how valuable technical writers are. Now go show the labor pool how valuable your creativity is in doing it.

Sharpen your pencil. Your black or yellow or blue or green pencil. Your integrated pencil. Learn the 5 Ws of online help. Learn the tools of the trade and some design principles. But importantly, learn how they all fit together and have fun blending and blending.

Integration is not just for populations and it isn’t a battle, that’s for sure.

It’s logical and it works, and NOW you can be a content strategist.

A Guided Tour in Tech Writing

Photo by Luis Quintero on Unsplash

Part of the Research Backpack

As writer’s, we’ve all got a toolbox or backpack full of our favorite things to use when we need to get a doc written, whether it’s a manual, proposal, or just a user guide. One of my personal favorites is a “Guided Tour,” because it involves asking a user who is able to articulate her needs, working with her to finesse the points, and then heading off to work my magic.

A Guided Tour is more than an interview, but less than a deep dive. It can be a simple phone call where we dash off some bullet points, but typically it provides some really great insight into what the document or website should look and feel like. As a hands-on, personable writer, this is usually something that, for me, saves a lot of work down the road.

How do you conduct a Guided Tour?

To begin the tour, it’s really a conversation with “muscle.” Ask the participant (sometimes there will be more than one, so I suggest having these tours one at a time) to give you a tour of their “space” as a concept. No, really. A walk through. You can do this physically with metaphors like:

“Imagine that your document or website is a house. What is the most important room, like the kitchen? Where does everyone end up at the party, despite the fact that you thought they would all be in the living room? Tell me about that most important place? Or, “When everyone arrives at your (document, website) what is the very first thing you want them to see? Is it the fireplace, the bookcase filled with your impressive reading list, the kids’ trophies from track? What really matters?”

Or, try a more exact approach:

“If you are walking through the aisles of the grocery store and you very much want to get just item X (the one you are designing for as priority), let’s talk about the things your readers will see before they get there – the user guide, the table of contents, the FAQ…and why.

You can talk through where the product is stored and how. You can discuss whether there are video links and archives, whether users are taken to other environments like sales and marketing and whether that is okay or distracting.

I often use imagery like organizing kitchens and garages because they are simple to visualize and valuable visually.

Identify Customizable Environments

Everyone’s product, like their house, is unique. We sometimes think that plug and play really means that, and that we are “stuck” within templates. We are not. Even minor changes will strike fear into participants, but if you are listening on your Guided Tour, you will find that they have customized an environment with their own acronyms, business terms, and priorities.

Asking a participant to guide you through their use of an application, even if it seems like it would be a strict template, can give you amazing insights. A good example is a Guided Tour through using the bells and whistles in their car. Just when you think just about everything is the same, you learn that there are some fantastic differences, and as a designer you learn that there are cool things that users wish they had that you could easily accommodate – and that, my friends, is where the magic happens! So use your observation skills, your enormous brain, and your determination to make that magic.

Deliver the goods

All of this is of course oversimplified for a blog post, but I know everyone who reads my brilliant prose is clever enough to extrapolate how it’s done.

Ask a participant to walk you through their reality and their wish list. Pay attention to how they dress up their product, their application, and their home environment. You will learn more than you thought possible about not only how they use what they have, but what they wish they could add to it – and you will likely find that you can help them alleviate that pain. You’ll be their hero when you can deliver that solution. (Trust me, gang, I’ve done it more than once!)

Write the architecture, organize the structure, and deliver the new wireframe or design. Often, the biggest roadblock is getting started.

Did you ever open the garage door on a sunny Saturday afternoon, having decided that today is the day you are going to finally clean that sucker out, get it all organized and be able to park your SUV in there at last? Sure you have! But then you realize that your daughter’s ice skates from her single 1982 figure skating season are in there, along with your husband’s college t-shirt collection because you once had a neighbor who made quilts out of those, and you agreed to store your mother in law’s dog crate. Besides, the holiday decorations still need to be taken to the thrift donation place, and…

Photo by Alex Rhee on Unsplash

I digress. You have to buy shelves and bins, and that is a lot to take on in one day. There’s a better way to – start. Maybe have a Guided Tour with the participants? Get an idea of how to use the space. Conduct this exercise with your users and determine where to house the skates, whether to hire the quilt lady, and so on.

Once you harness how everyone applies it, you will have drafted the shelves, and you can build an excellent user guide to the garage. A dazzling application, thrilling API for searching sports equipment in garage 2.0.

Namaste.

You got the “D”?

Photo by Mark Claus on Unsplash

No matter what size your company is, or how well-known, I can assure you, every opportunity grasped or missed is the direct, straight-line result of a decision made or a decision delayed.

At lots of companies, decisions get stuck in a pipeline of waiting, approval, hemming and hawing, and sometimes they just die on a vine of withering that is just plain sad to see. Call it bureaucracy, call it checks and balances, call it whatever you like, but it is the companies that are agile, that pivot quickly (stop me if I venture too far into buzz words here, but they caught on for a reason) that survive and even thrive to defeat the others.

Making good decisions, and making them quickly, are the shining coins of successful businesses.

So why is a tech writer posting anything about them? I thought you’d never ask! You see, technical writing has ventured into the deep, lush forest of what now has the lovely, shiny name of “Product Operations” at some of those agile, savvy businesses. Those smart folks took a look around and figured out that the smart folks typing away were…wait for it…learning.

Yes, indeed. And they were right.

We writers have been busy doing, you guessed it, reading. We actually read the stuff we write, believe it or not, and some of it seeps in and we understand it. So when it came time to clear the bottlenecks of business, it sort of made sense to turn to the technical writers who’ve been sitting there reading and writing everything from user guides to employee handbooks all these years and ask them for some insight.

Some of us agreed to offer an opinion or two, and Product Operations was born.

One of the repeated mantras, week in and week out, that I offered to my teams in this process was:

If you oppose, you must propose.

Yep – learn it, commit it to memory. Take it to your teams. Feel free to swipe it. I think I stole it from someone else, and I’m not giving them credit here, so you don’t even have to say you nicked it from me, you can just take it and use it and hog all the credit. (See if it gets you a bit of a promotion or a raise. That’d be nice.)

What it means is, you can point out where something goes wrong – a process, a system, a way of doing things. Go ahead and say it doesn’t work. But then – you have to pony up a way to fix it. We may not use that way, but we won’t ditch it right out of the gate. The most important thing is, you can’t just complain. If you don’t have some sort of solution in mind, even a solution that, in the end, doesn’t fit, you have to keep your trap shut. Don’t point out the flaw until you’ve conjured up a workaround. Even a bad workaround.

A less-than-great decision executed quickly is usually better than no decision executed, or a good decision executed slowly. I mean, a bad decision is going to be a bad decision no matter what. But if you have a brilliant idea but it takes you five years to execute on it, do you really think it was worth it? You can tweak and modify as you go if you just get out of the gate. This is not cutting your bangs we’re talking about here, and even if it was, they’ll grow back. Usually we are talking about developing a new software program or implementing meeting-free Tuesdays. Start building Rome right away. By the time you get the blueprints made, you’ll find the perfect bricklayer, I assure you.

Start mixing mortar.

Right there, that’s the trick. Pick up a stick, or a shovel, or whatever the implement is, and choose. It’s just mortar. You can’t stir it once it dries. So, begin making decisions on a small scale in order to bring about success. As my grandmother once told me, everything can be fixed except death.

I think she might have been exaggerating a bit, so I don’t take it quite that far, but I have determined as a writer that until I hit “send” or “publish,” that I can just decide to write, I can move words around, I can float ideas and concepts, and that to do so is never bad.

In the mode of Product Operations, I started looking at things like information architecture, content strategy, and the blend of systems as a necessary way to get decisions made.

Lo and behold, it worked.

My team began to look at the gaps in our processes and realized that although we each knew what to do when there was a software outage, we each knew what to do when we had to deliver “less than positive” news to a partner or affiliate, we had never concretized that anywhere. So, off we went to create an “Incident Management Guide.”

Similarly, although we had our system down cold for how to manage time and processes in-house, we realized that if a significant part of our team left by, say, taking new opportunities with other companies, the knowledge vacuum would be fierce. The amount of just “stuff” we carried around in our brains about the day-to-day that kept the job pleasant and smooth was astonishing. So we set out to make it a thing. This was despite our tendency as a crew to just be renegade in our approach to daily office behavior, where a meeting was just as likely to be over coffee as it was to be in a conference room. Suddenly, processes and procedures were born.

Some decisions matter, some don’t.

All of this is to say, throughout my years (and they are numerous) I have found that there’s a certain transition from small operation to large, from laid back attitude to not, and back again, that says you somehow gotta put some stuff in writing even when you are pretty sure you don’t. It just makes life easier when you deputize people to have The “D” and to turnaround that decision more easily because they know they can. To build a team with that mojo because it says in a manual (online or in print, with chill or without – you do you) that they can. We built a very nifty team of people, and then we were really able to get stuff done on a big scale by saying, “here’s how we get stuff done.”

I’m just pointing out that it makes life easier if you know:

Do you got the “D”?

A Beginner’s Guide to Technical Writing

Okay, so I admit I put this aside for nearly a whole year because I thought I wasn’t really going to speak much to the topic any more. I shifted my focus into Product Operations with a cool company. I moved from one city to another. My youngest graduated from high school and I was on to other projects. I finished a book and started looking for agents. Frankly, I was too cool for school and I thought maybe I would just let this thing go the way of the dinosaur and that was okay by me.

Product Ops was, in a way, a bit cooler than Doc Ops anyway, and I thought I didn’t have time to focus on tech writing. To be fair, my new job was taking up a whole bunch of my time. (I know, that is a whole laundry list of excuses, right there.) I forgot that I actually enjoy tech writing and all that comes with it, and I had no crystal ball that would tell me that in the wake of a pesky little virus, my company would see Product Operations as, well…expendable.

So I am in my home office, a cozy little spot, thinking again about the demand for technical writers, and surmising that there is indeed a demand in the increase for technical products, and that even as the curve begins to flatten out, we’ll see an uptick in the need for folks like me (and presumably you) to explain all of this stuff to laypersons.

According to Venturebeat, Zoom, the online meeting tool that allows users to hear and see their meeting mates in realtime, daily users “ballooned” from 10 million to 200 million in April alone.

Talk about a tech explosion, and that is a simple use-case. The users in that example are an average group – teachers, friends, regular Joe offices. These are not high-tech examples, and the technology behind Zoom was already in place, no major infrastructure had to be spun up. So…yeah…

If we try to imagine the future just a little bit, and we know from previous models that any time there is a world-changing event (think 911), things will most certainly not go back to they way they were, we will see a host of new changes, new technologies emerging.

Want an example?

Let’s stick with 911 – after that horrific event, we had the need for new scanning devices at every airport in America. All of those came with installation manuals and both digital and print guides. Tech writers. We had body imaging tools – tech manuals. We had risk mitigation manuals – tech writers. We had procedurals, process manuals, new technical guides on airplanes, FAA guides, you name it. A veritable cornucopia of writing.

In the wake of this virus, the same will happen. There are protocols, articles, tools, procedures, styles, guidelines, materials, but there is software, hardware, programs, – you get where I am going.

So how does all of this matter to the new technical writer? Why did I title this piece “A Beginner’s Guide to Technical Writing?” I did not just have a fit of memory loss.

Growing Demand

Employment growth in this field will exceed estimates due to continuing increases in products and procedures. It simply has to.

Technical writers have to be lifelong learners. If you happen to be the kind of person who has ever said, “Wow, I wish I could just go to school for the rest of my life.” I suggest you might want to be a tech writer. I get to learn stuff every day. It’s pretty sweet. I have the pleasure of learning, teaching, writing, disseminating. And I learn about really cool things.

There Are Few Limits

Okay, if you are all, “But I don’t want to write about software. Yawn” I hear that. I mean, software makes my heart go pitter-pat, but if that isn’t your jam, I get it. But hear this: technical writing gets into transportation, energy, television, academia, publishing, and…yeah, health (wasn’t I just talking about viruses?). So if you are all scienc-ey, or if you’re all about jets or planes or something, get in there.

It’s also about planning. If you don’t fancy yourself the kind of person who can just sit down and write about a topic, that’s fine. I am never that person. I have note cards or post-its, or now I have files in my computer, y’know, fancy programs and roadmaps, but you do you. I plan stuff. I plan it quickly now that I am a grown up, but still. It’s not unlike a semester where I had fifteen weeks to think through a project and execute on it. Project planning is a key thing. I am half project manager and half writer. I know my stuff before I pull out the keyboard, and what I don’t know – I learn. Woot!

It’s Partly UX, Which Is Super Fun.

I already have too many (is there such a thing as too many?) degrees, but if I didn’t I’d go back and get another one in UX. A big part of this career is user testing, user interface. Man, is it fun. You get to figure out how the people who interact with what you write actually use what you write, and whether or not you did it well. Does the reader understand what you said and follow the directions? Did they miss a step? Did you anticipate their initial reactions and questions, or are you so familiar with the product/concept/tooling that you missed it? It’s like a game where you play it out before you write and determine who they are, what they need, where they will be when they read, why they are reading it in the first place, how they will read it (on a phone, on a tablet, in a car…), why they will read it (is something broken, are they installing, is there a question), when they will read it (are they at work, did they just open the box)…and it’s like a choose-your-own-adventure book. You can create maps and endings based on various outcomes, except you have to be careful because if you create too many variable endings you’ll have a 5,000 page user manual and that is ludicrous!

You Are a Mapmaker

Just like planning various endings, you create treasure maps. You can create wireframes for websites, but you can do this with words, with tables of contents, with document maps. Learn to do it well, and you will be great at your job, and people will come to you for advice. At my company, I always felt great when colleagues came to me to ask where they should house documents, where it seemed “right” to put new information.

I often talked with teams about how Information Architecture was a lot like organizing a brand-new house. If you go into a housing development, many of the houses have the same footprint, or similar. The kitchens are “kind of” the same, but each one will be organized a little differently. You can bet that in them, if you look, the glasses are kept in one cupboard, and the plates in another; you won’t find things strewn all over.

But each kitchen will have its own personality. Its own flavor.

The garages, though? Oh dear. Those houses, and those garages. They are probably a storm of a mess.

So what I do is come in and provide some structure for those garages. I provide organization, shelves and bins and labels to all of that information. That is a great part of being a technical writer. The organization of all of those words and labels and ideas. You make the map of all of the information, sometimes in small chunks, and sometimes for the whole organization.

Start Out

If all of this seems like a lot, and perhaps a bit disjointed, welcome to the life of a technical writer. If all of this seems like fun and intriguing, and like a cool way to spend your day, welcome to the life of a technical writer.

Start trolling LinkedIn for some entry level positions because there will continue to be a tech-driven economy, and a need for more people who are willing to understand the language to explain the code and the machinery and the science.

If that’s you, and yet you enjoy the writing and the grammar and the syntax, the next 20 years are yours.

Namaste.

Who needs an Editorial Calendar? You, that’s Who.

For a long time, I thought that content management should be an organic process. That is to say, when something needed to be written or re-written, I’d know it, because the project or task would manifest itself as a feature or project story through my Agile Development calendar or it would emerge through technical debt, and I’d address it. I could do content cleanup and I wouldn’t waste precious hours calendaring. I already spend time providing regular posts and I have a notes app where I jot ideas – I have plenty of them – so I can harvest things. I use Evernote to tack web pages for references to my writing, so for a long time I thought an editorial calendar was superfluous.

But…

When my writing came to more teamwork and content that impacted internal teams as well as tech, well then. Sharing platforms and thinking about notation on spreadsheets? Content planning became a science as much as an art. Into my world came the Editorial Calendar. I thought about what I might want to do in planning, not just on a whim.

An editorial calendar allows me to:

  • Consider a production schedule that is more consistent
  • Track social media
  • Encourage collaboration, not just solo production
  • Balance content for graphics, media, and formatting
  • Be accountable, if only to myself
  • Analyze posts for popularity and relevance
  • Plan things seasonally, well in advance

There are so many resources for calendaring that it can be overwhelming at first, but it’s not too hard to winnow things down quickly. Curata has a sweet graphic of templates and their features.

But I tend to just use Google Sheets. (not my sample)

WordPress also has a Plug-in, but hey…we all find our groove, right?

So what should go in your calendar? Well, that is largely up to you, but the basics are the basics:

How much content – are you super sleek and it’s just a tweet a day? Maybe, but it might be a blog post or even a few articles, a column, maybe a book chapter? Maybe you are looking at weekly, monthly targets.

Personas – definitely scope out your targets

Producers – who writes your stuff, who is responsible for what: copy, editors, will your blogging team in-house handle it or do you outsource some? Do you have a team, or solo folks? Name names.

Frequency of delivery – not frequency of writing, but when does the copy move out the door

Last, be flexy – Remember, there are holidays, people take leave (even you) and stuff might need an edit pass, new research, something changes. There are dates and then there are deadlines. Look, if a date is immovable, put it in bold red. But otherwise, understand that quality is super important. Ideas sometimes get superseded by better ideas.

I recently wrote a memoir. It took more than 2 years. I am still looking for an agent. The book is finished, but no one is publishing it yet. That part is not on my calendar, but the to-do lists surrounding it are. They are not concrete, but pretty close. They are important but not firm. My publishing schedule is important, they are on my editorial calendar just like this post was on my calendar, but I had to look up some stuff.

There were some work dates that were also important that needed addressing before I could do my fact-checking for this, so those went in. But hey, look, this made the site. Cool! And you are reading it (you are, right?) so yay, me.

Go find an app, test it out and kick the tires.

Calendar some dates – put an editorial calendar on your calendar.

Dear Writers, Please Fail to Succeed

I’ve been a little focused on failure as the path to success lately. I think it is because my daughter is graduating from college and my son is graduating from high school, both in the same year, and both are sharply focused on what to do next. They are hyper-focused on the need to succeed, and I am spending more and more time reassuring them that there is more than one path to success, more than one definition of success, more than one way to measure success.

Allow me to meander a bit. We’ll focus on writing in a moment.

My daughter is a talented singer. She attended Ithaca College for vocal performance. That college is no joke for vocalists. Throughout high school, she experienced measurable success, though she tried to achieve more. As a college senior, though, she had a tough time with graduate school auditions and didn’t gain admission to the schools she wanted – she saw this as failure. My son is an actor. He attends a performing arts high school, he has been in more plays and musicals -both amateur and professional- than will fit on a resume. He was invited to audition for some of the top college conservatory programs on the east coast, only to be turned down time after time. He, like his sister, saw this as failure. My heart broke for both of them, like any mother’s would. They work so hard. They are so well-trained and educated. What happened? There is no simple answer. But instead of looking backward, the only way to look is ahead. What comes next? A plan to succeed. How to turn those downturns into something valuable.

Both kids now have separate paths ahead. My daughter is focused on a year of training and working with vocal students, looking into vocal health and perhaps a conducting MFA in another year. My son accepted an offer from a great college in New York not for theatre, but for film. Once he shifted his view, a whole new picture emerged. Actors are in movies, after all.

So on to writing…

I’ve written plenty of documentation that misses the mark. I have to go back to it and rethink, rework the process until it hits. I read the work of Nobel Prize winners Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, who articulated how important it is to feel insecure, to lose, to get things wrong. (I am far oversimplifying this but the gist is – you must fail.)

As people, to succeed, we have to embrace failure in order to succeed. Tech giant Jack Ma spoke at the World Economic Forum in 2018 about his failure when he applied for a job at KFC. 24 people applied for positions, 23 people were hired. He was not one. He applied to Harvard 10 times. He was not accepted. 10 times! Talk about really wanting something!  Failure hurts, indeed, but we learn from it. It’s normal and maybe we should see it as a little less detrimental and harmful if we can start to view it as part of our growth. (I still doubt that I would apply ten times, but…)

I recently read H. Jon Benjamin’s “Failure is an Option” while on a road trip. Seriously funny stuff, that book. Part memoir, part joke, the whole book had me in stitches. If the guy who blends Archer and Bob’s Burgers and landed in a big pot of wealthy can’t talk to you about failing, who else can? And he can write, too! As a writer, I respect that. I brought his thinking to my writing, and to my workplace. He may not be drafting technical manuals, but the point is still the same. You can reinvent text, yourself, your path, and your work. Failure IS an option. Just don’t flog yourself over it. Don’t make it a habit, unless you are a comedian, and then if you are, write a book about it and cash in on the whole life experience.

Henry Ford is thought to have said “failure is the opportunity to begin again, more intelligently.” And I’ve read that it took Dyson vacuums 5,127 prototypes in order to arrive at that amazing, ultra-successful 5,128th model that we are willing to pay a handsome fee for – all to have a great experience.

Workplaces that penalize failure wind up with low-talent, low-energy responsibility-shirkers. In technical writing, and in any kind of writing, it is taking a risk, being willing to innovate and develop new methods, new approaches, and new techniques that blazes a new path to truly dynamic customer experiences.

Our work is integral to our lives. Our successes are integral to our work. What we do defines who we are, whether that is our job, our home life, our sports or our pastimes. When there is opportunity in decision-making, there is risk and there is reward (unless there isn’t).

So, dear writers, break out the pen, not the safe pencil with the eraser, and make yourself uncomfortable. Mess it up. Then fix it. Then learn from it. Fail…to succeed.

The Data Story

I’ve mentioned before that I am something of a Data Nerd. This is unusual for someone who is also a “word artist,” but hey, a girl can wear more than one hat, can’t she? I’m also a mother, a triathlete, and a lover of Emily Dickinson’s poetry. In high school, no one would have pegged me as a future triathlete, and no one who knows me now would imagine that I was ever *not* an athlete, so there you have it: the Venn diagram of Susan.

At the heart of this is data. But data about just me is not all that interesting. Data about thousands of people, and especially customers – now that is interesting. Even better is this funky cool tool called “Google Trends.”

As a technical writer and UX Copy Writer, I find this handy-dandy tool super fun and useful. You may be asking why. I’ll tell ya.

With a heavy-lifter of a creation like this, I can sit back and think about trends and numbers in ways I used to have to do lots and lots of work to get at. Research is a UX/UI wonk’s best asset. If I understand what people like, what people do, what people are looking for – I am on top of the world! I can simply and easily take a look at what was, generally, trending in the United States in 2014:

Searches included World Cup, Ebola, Malaysia Airlines, and Flappy Bird. People wanted to know about Kim Novak, and Jared Leto, and the Paleo diet was all the rage. By 2018, folks were clicking to learn about how to apply magnetic lashes. The Paleo diet was gone, but the Keto diet was in. Mega Millions was a top search, along with Logan Paul and Megan Markle.

Peoples’ interests and learning curves mark what I need to know, and they show this in words. Words make their decisions, drive their purchases, and reveal their inner thoughts.

So why is all this information so important? Again, I’ll tell ya.

I like to know which words people choose, and why they choose them. Wouldn’t you like to know why I write this blog, and why I choose the topics I do? I choose the topics because something pops into my head, or creeps its way in after I think about it for a while, and it is something that has been trending, or poking away and needs (in my opinion) to be discussed. It has to do with tech writing, or aspects of technology, women, and writing, and therefore fits the general parameters of this forum. Follow? But then, also it has to interest me. So there is an overlap. That’s where the Venn diagram hits. My interests, crossing over with my expertise, crossing over with something that I think will appeal to YOU.

And then, I write about it. But without the data that I could gather from some nifty tool like Google Trends, where would I be? I’d have no idea that the latest trend, in May of 2019, is that there have been more than 100K searches for Theresa May, and more than 20K of those searches were in Canada. Neat, too, that over 5k Canadian folks searched today (5/24) for the results of the cricket match between Pakistan and Afghanistan, right? Again, why does this matter? Well, because I doubt that any reference in my design documents in the US that refer to cricket would conjure the sport as much as they would reference the insect. And while Theresa May is the top search in Canada, the movie “Aladdin” is the top search in the US, so that tells us a bit about what Americans are thinking this weekend, doesn’t it?

To tie this all back to data and words, I’ll keep it simple. The more we know about users, the more we know. This data isn’t spying, and it isn’t creepy. It is downright useful. As a UX designer and writer, as a technical writer, and as a strong customer advocate, it really, truly, sincerely is all information-based. Lots of times, people in my orbit who are not in the tech realm get a little freaked out about all of this information gathering. But I don’t. I like it a whole lot when I can use data – information – numbers – WORDS – to get me where I am going and get me what I need a lot faster.

Even better when I can deliver that to my users.

Namaste.

Making Meaning

Back when I was an undergrad (please do not stop and linger long enough to consider how long ago that was), and I declared that I would be an “English major,” that declaration struck fear in the hearts of many. It did so because to those not-so-intrepid folks, that meant I believed, in folly, that I could write the Great American Novel, or that I would be content living a life for a few years as a starving poet, only to eventually cave in and become a teacher. My mother was a high school English teacher. Her mother was a sixth grade English teacher. The path appeared to have been laid.

I, however, had no real intention of becoming a traditional high school English teacher. I did enjoy a stint for a two-year period as a “teaching artist” at a performing arts magnet school where I had the luxury of teaching creative nonfiction for two and a half hours each afternoon, but I seriously cannot put that in the same bucket as mapping out rubrics for Huckleberry Finn or Hamlet for ninth graders.

Instead, that time provided me with a fantastic foundation for my own writing, which I still do (you are reading some of it at this moment), and the luxury of my mornings free. It was a great time. It launched me into other cool projects, and I got to work with aspiring writers without ever having to get my teaching certificate. I’ll take that as a win.

I moved through writing positions, always knowing what those early doubters knew: people think writing is easy, until it isn’t.

It is only in fairly recent history that writers have dovetailed so well with users and designers. (I have another post about this, so take a look at some older posts and you’ll see my position on UX and writing – I was ahead of the curve!) User Experience, or UX, was for a while considered to be a design concept, not a language one. Few people thought that the words themselves contained meaning. Most believed that an arrow was just an arrow – it could point users to what they needed, and whether it contained text was of no importance. That is, we thought that it didn’t matter what the pop-up or tab had written on it, just that there was a pop-up or tab. It’s not until we had dozens of those tabs from which to choose that things got murky.

But those of us who focus on words intervened to disagree. We started to ask, would users rather “click” or “select?” Is it a “flyer” or a “flier?” Are we really going to have yet another discussion about “dropdown” versus “pulldown?” We absolutely are going to have that discussion. And our customers will be glad we did. That disruptive error message a user gets – if it isn’t too disruptive, a customer won’t give up on using the software we have so lovingly designed. So, while marketing copywriters are diligently working to bring us customers, if we as tech writers and UX writers ensure a smooth journey through the software, we can keep those customers around for a long, long time. They will have had meaningful interactions with our product and our interventions.

Let the marketers worry about conversion. Let the us, as UX and Tech writers, worry about facilitation.

One of the things I have enjoyed most about technical writing is just that – facilitation. I often say that a big part of my job is “smoothing out the pain points” for those who use my software. I joke that no one reads the doc, but that is not entirely true. They read the doc when they have a specific need. That need is at installation: when they are brand-new and want to ramp up fast. Or, they read it when they hit a trouble spot: they want a solution to a problem. But there is a whole lot of “doc” in the interim, and that doc is within the product itself – the entirety of the product design contains compelling microcopy (or sometimes the microcopy is the opposite of compelling, let’s be honest). Prioritizing the user journey not just visually, but textually, a good writer can work with a good designer, and hit the jackpot, so-to-speak.

Extremely good UX means an extremely satisfied customer. A customer whose needs are highlighted by thoughtful text is one who sees a compelling product, I assure you. I feel the same way about technical documentation. If the tech doc supports a well-crafted product, and supports it concisely, there is little need for a stressful support call. Not all software (or any other product, for that matter) can be so well designed that it needs no documentation whatsoever. What we must do as writers in all realms is to create an experience, from microcopy to large-scale content, that is smooth and clean. If we do that, we’ll have done our jobs well. We will have made not just copy, but meaning.